Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-09-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 460 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.33 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a 94.9 score against 80.1. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has iOS 16.x operating system, while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo operating system. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is a extremely newer cellphone, and it is also notably thinner and just a bit lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better display than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. IPhone 14 Pro Max has a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a 64-bits processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better battery performance than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4323mAh.
IPhone 14 Pro Max features a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
IPhone 14 Pro Max is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.