Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 460 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is much better than Galaxy XCover Pro, with a 94.9 score against 81. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max's construction is much newer and incredibly thinner, but a bit heavier than Galaxy XCover Pro. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with iOS 16.x OS, while Galaxy XCover Pro comes with Android 11 OS.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a quite superior processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has less cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and 2 GB more RAM memory. IPhone 14 Pro Max has just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a little larger screen, a higher 1290 x 2796 resolution and a quite greater pixels density.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot more megapixels back camera.
IPhone 14 Pro Max counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 7 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy XCover Pro. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.