Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-16 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 460 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has a global score of 94.9, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's global score of 88.5. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max comes with iOS 16.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip works with Android 12 OS. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max construction is newer, but a little bit thicker and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size screen, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also has a quite better pixel density and a quite better resolution of 1290 x 2796px. Galaxy Z Flip has a very superior memory for apps and games than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has a superior processing unit than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. IPhone 14 Pro Max features superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4323mAh battery capacity.
IPhone 14 Pro Max features a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also has a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the iPhone 14 Pro Max is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.