Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-16 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 460 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro Max has a global score of 94.9, which is a bit better than Galaxy Z Fold 2's score of 94.6. IPhone 14 Pro Max's construction is newer and lighter than Galaxy Z Fold 2's, although it is also somewhat thicker. IPhone 14 Pro Max works with iOS 16.x operating system, and Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with Android 11 operating system.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1290 x 2796px, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels amount per inch of screen. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a quite better performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The iPhone 14 Pro Max takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also has a camera in the back with a lot better 48 MP resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a little bit longer battery life than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has a 4% larger battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, iPhone 14 Pro Max is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.