Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 16.x | -- |
| 2022-09-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2556 x 1179 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 461 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro is much better than the Google Pixel 3, having a 95.6 score against 80. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro construction has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 3, but it's noticeably heavier. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro features a brighter display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a little more pixels per inch of display, a bit higher 1179 x 2556 resolution and a little bit larger screen.
The iPhone 14 Pro has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro features a quite superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, because although it has less cpu cores , it also counts with more RAM and a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone 14 Pro shoots better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same aperture, the iPhone 14 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and higher video frame rates. The iPhone 14 Pro has just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3200mAh battery size.
Although iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.