Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 16.x | -- |
| 2022-09-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2556 x 1179 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 461 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 14 Pro has an overall score of 95.6, which is better than the Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 score. Apple iPhone 14 Pro is a somewhat heavier device than Google Pixel 3 XL, but both are equally thin. The iPhone 14 Pro counts with a better looking screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a just a little lower screen density, a bit lower resolution of 1179 x 2556 and a little smaller display.
IPhone 14 Pro counts with a quite better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a higher amount of RAM memory. The iPhone 14 Pro shoots better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the iPhone 14 Pro also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and faster video frame rate.
IPhone 14 Pro features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit longer battery performance than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a 3430mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Although iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3 XL. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3 XL, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.