Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 16.x | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-16 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2556 x 1179 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 461 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro has a general score of 95.6, which is a lot better than Google Pixel 3a's overall score of 78.8. The iPhone 14 Pro body is a lot newer and a little thinner, but also way heavier than the Google Pixel 3a. IPhone 14 Pro comes with iOS 16.x OS, while Google Pixel 3a works with Android 11 OS.
The iPhone 14 Pro counts with a quite superior performance than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and more RAM memory. Apple iPhone 14 Pro features a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1179 x 2556, a little bigger display and a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The iPhone 14 Pro features a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3200mAh battery size. IPhone 14 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the iPhone 14 Pro also has a camera in the back with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Although iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 14 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.