Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 16.x | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-16 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2556 x 1179 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 461 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro is way better than Google Pixel 3a XL, having a score of 95.6 against 78.9. Although iPhone 14 Pro is heavier than Google Pixel 3a XL, it's just a bit thinner and extremely newer. IPhone 14 Pro works with iOS 16.x OS, while Google Pixel 3a XL comes with Android 11 OS. The iPhone 14 Pro counts with a lot better screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little bit higher 1179 x 2556 resolution, a bit larger display and a just a bit higher pixel density.
IPhone 14 Pro features a faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a higher amount of RAM. The iPhone 14 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the iPhone 14 Pro also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal memory. The Google Pixel 3a XL has just a little better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Although iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy iPhone 14 Pro, else you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 3a XL, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.