Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 16.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-16 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Just black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2556 x 1179 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 461 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro is better than Google Pixel 4a, getting a general score of 95.6 against 82.9. IPhone 14 Pro's body is noticeably newer and a little thinner, but also incredibly heavier than Google Pixel 4a. The iPhone 14 Pro works with iOS 16.x operating system, while Google Pixel 4a works with Android 11 operating system.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro has a better looking display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a bit larger screen, a bit higher 1179 x 2556 resolution and a bit greater screen density. The Google Pixel 4a and Apple iPhone 14 Pro both count with very similar memory to install applications and games, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro has a greater processing power than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 2 less CPU cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro features a little better battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
IPhone 14 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the iPhone 14 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Although iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4a. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.