Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 16.x | -- |
| 2022-09-16 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2556 x 1179 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 461 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro has a score of 95.6, which is much better than Moto Z2 Play's global score of 77.4. Even though the iPhone 14 Pro is incredibly newer than the Moto Z2 Play, it is noticeably thicker and incredibly heavier. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro counts with a better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with more RAM and a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone 14 Pro has a much better screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a quite bigger screen, a higher 1179 x 2556 resolution and a little bit greater pixels count per inch of display. The iPhone 14 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the iPhone 14 Pro also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone 14 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The iPhone 14 Pro counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy iPhone 14 Pro, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.