Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | -- |
| 2022-09-16 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2556 x 1179 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 461 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 14 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A50, with a 95.6 score against 83.8. Even though the Apple iPhone 14 Pro is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy A50, it is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The iPhone 14 Pro counts with a superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has 2 less cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a 64-bit processor.
IPhone 14 Pro has a way better looking display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels amount per inch of screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1179 x 2556. The iPhone 14 Pro features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light captures, it also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone 14 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50 counts with greater battery duration than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Although iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A50. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone 14 Pro, else you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A50, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.