Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | -- |
| 2022-09-16 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2556 x 1179 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 461 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy A52, getting a 95.6 score against 90.7. The iPhone 14 Pro construction is newer and a little thinner than Galaxy A52's, although it's also a little heavier. The iPhone 14 Pro has a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1179 x 2556px resolution and a just a little higher pixels amount in each inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 14 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The iPhone 14 Pro features a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has less CPU cores , and they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone 14 Pro also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much longer battery duration than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a 41% greater battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.