Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.6 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | -- |
| 2022-09-16 | 2018-11-15 |
| 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2556 x 1179 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 461 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.33 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro is better than Galaxy A9 (2018), with a 95.6 score against 85.2. Apple iPhone 14 Pro is a heavier phone than the Galaxy A9 (2018), but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1179 x 2556 resolution and a little bit greater screen pixel density.
The iPhone 14 Pro has a quite better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has 2 less CPU cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 14 Pro also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much greater memory for applications and games than iPhone 14 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro takes a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a way higher resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a 3800mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.