Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-16 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2556 x 1179 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 461 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is a bit better than Apple iPhone 14 Pro's 95.6 score. The Galaxy Fold works with Android 9.0 Pie OS, while Apple iPhone 14 Pro has iOS 16.x OS. Galaxy Fold's body is thinner than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, although it's noticeably heavier and was released 3 years before.
The iPhone 14 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1179 x 2556px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per display inch. Apple iPhone 14 Pro counts with a more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory and less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro has a superior camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal memory. Galaxy Fold counts with a much better battery duration than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than iPhone 14 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as iPhone 14 Pro. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy iPhone 14 Pro, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.