Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | Android 5.0 |
| 2022-09-16 | -- |
| 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | -- |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2556 x 1179 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 461 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 10.8 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.33 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro is much better than the Galaxy S6 Active, with a global score of 95.6 against 80.9. Apple iPhone 14 Pro has iOS 16.x operating system, and Galaxy S6 Active counts with Android 5.0 operating system. IPhone 14 Pro has a little better processing power than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 64-bits CPU, the iPhone 14 Pro also counts with 3 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit more vivid screen than iPhone 14 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen density and a bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video and a camera with way more mega pixels.
The iPhone 14 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy S6 Active features a bit longer battery life than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a 9 percent larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S6 Active. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.