Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | -- |
| 2022-09-16 | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2556 x 1179 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 461 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro has a score of 95.6, which is better than the Galaxy S9's 83.3 overall score. Although iPhone 14 Pro is much heavier than the Galaxy S9, it's a little thinner and much newer. IPhone 14 Pro counts with a superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro has a better display than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1179 x 2556 pixels and a just a little worse count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit larger display. Apple iPhone 14 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro also counts with a camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy S9 features a bigger storage for games and applications than iPhone 14 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 400 GB. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro features a little longer battery life than Galaxy S9, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S9, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S9. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy S9, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.