Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-09-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2556 x 1179 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 461 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.33 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a 95.6 score against 80.1. The iPhone 14 Pro works with iOS 16.x OS, while Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. The iPhone 14 Pro design is newer, lighter and noticeably thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Apple iPhone 14 Pro has a better processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has lesser cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a 64-bit processing unit.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1179 x 2556 pixels and a little worse screen density, it also counts with a larger screen. IPhone 14 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior battery duration than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Apple iPhone 14 Pro is also the cheapest one, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.