Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2556 x 1179 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 461 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, with a global score of 95.6 against 81. The iPhone 14 Pro counts with iOS 16.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro works with Android 11 operating system. IPhone 14 Pro's design is a lot newer, a little lighter and way thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro features a much sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1179 x 2556 pixels and a little bit greater count of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy XCover Pro has a better storage capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro has a greater performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has less CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64-bits processing unit. Apple iPhone 14 Pro captures better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with better battery life than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a 27 percent more battery capacity.
IPhone 14 Pro costs a lot more than Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.