Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-16 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2556 x 1179 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 461 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro has a score of 95.6, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 overall score. The iPhone 14 Pro is a incredibly newer device than the Galaxy Z Flip, although it is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The iPhone 14 Pro comes with iOS 16.x OS, and Galaxy Z Flip works with Android 12 OS.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro features a more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Apple iPhone 14 Pro has a much better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1179 x 2556px resolution and a quite greater quantity of pixels in each inch of screen.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro has a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, a same size camera aperture and the same video frame rate, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro also has a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better battery performance than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The iPhone 14 Pro not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.