Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| iOS 16.x | Android 10 |
| 2022-09-16 | 2020-12-21 |
| 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2556 x 1179 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 461 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.33 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro is a lot better than the ZTE Axon 20, with a 95.6 score against 77.8. IPhone 14 Pro comes with iOS 16.x OS, and ZTE Axon 20 comes with Android 10 OS. The iPhone 14 Pro construction has the same thickness than the ZTE Axon 20, but it's a little bit heavier. IPhone 14 Pro has a better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone 14 Pro features a much more vibrant display than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1179 x 2556px resolution and a bit more pixels per screen inch. ZTE Axon 20 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a back camera with much more MP.
ZTE Axon 20 features as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as the iPhone 14 Pro one, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage. The ZTE Axon 20 features better battery performance than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a 4220mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
The iPhone 14 Pro costs a lot more money than the ZTE Axon 20, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.