Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 16.x | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-16 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| (Product) RED, Blue, Midnight and Purple Starlight | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3279mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 has an overall score of 92.5, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3a's global score of 78.8. The iPhone 14 body is extremely newer and a bit thinner than the Google Pixel 3a's, although it's heavier. IPhone 14 works with iOS 16.x OS, while Google Pixel 3a works with Android 11 OS.
IPhone 14 counts with a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a quite larger screen, a bit greater pixels density and a quite better 1170 x 2532 resolution. The Apple iPhone 14 features a more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has 2 less cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a greater amount of RAM.
The iPhone 14 features a much better storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The iPhone 14 has just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3279mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Apple iPhone 14 captures a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light photos.
Although iPhone 14 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 14, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.