Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.5 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | Android 14 |
| 2022-09-16 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| (Product) RED, Blue, Midnight and Purple Starlight | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 10.71 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3279mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 is much better than the Galaxy A35 5G, having a 92.5 score against 79.4. The Apple iPhone 14 construction is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than Galaxy A35 5G, even though it was released about 18 months before. Apple iPhone 14 works with iOS 16.x OS, while Galaxy A35 5G counts with Android 14 OS.
Apple iPhone 14 counts with a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 14 also counts with a 64-bits CPU. Apple iPhone 14 features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1170 x 2532 resolution, a much brighter screen and a just a bit higher pixel number in each inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a better camera than Apple iPhone 14, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera.
The Galaxy A35 5G and iPhone 14 count with really similar memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 14, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3279mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.