Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-09-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| (Product) RED, Blue, Midnight and Purple Starlight | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 457 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3279mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a 92.5 score against 80.1. Apple iPhone 14's design is way newer, much thinner and much lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. The Apple iPhone 14 counts with iOS 16.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro comes with Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
The iPhone 14 has just a bit better display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch of screen and a bit lower resolution of 1170 x 2532, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a greater memory for applications and games than iPhone 14, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Apple iPhone 14 features a faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a 64-bits processing unit. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has better battery duration than Apple iPhone 14, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
IPhone 14 features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera and the same camera aperture, the iPhone 14 also has a much better video resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the iPhone 14 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.