Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| -- | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| -- | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Glass and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| -- | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| A18 Pro (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than the iPhone 16 Pro Max, getting a score of 80.1 against 74.7. Galaxy XCover FieldPro comes with Android 8.0 Oreo OS, while iPhone 16 Pro Max counts with iOS OS. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way better display than iPhone 16 Pro Max, although it has a lot smaller screen.
The iPhone 16 Pro Max has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much powerful CPU than iPhone 16 Pro Max, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a much more megapixels back facing camera and a lot higher (4K) video definition. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a superior battery performance than iPhone 16 Pro Max.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.