Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| A18 Pro (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 1.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than the iPhone 16 Pro, getting a general score of 83.8 against 74.7. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a lot better processing power than Apple iPhone 16 Pro, because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores. Galaxy A50 counts with a much more vibrant display than Apple iPhone 16 Pro, because it has a little bigger display.
IPhone 16 Pro captures a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a much better resolution camera in the back. The Galaxy A50 features just a bit bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 16 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A50 has a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone 16 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.