Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| iOS 8.x, 7.x, 6.1, 6, 5.1, 5 | Android 10 |
| 2011-10-04 | 2020-05-05 |
| 4.54 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminium and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 290.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 640 x 960 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 330 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A5 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX 543MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 1.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is way better than Apple iPhone 4s, with a general score of 81.1 against 64.7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner phone than the Apple iPhone 4s, although it is noticeably heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 OS, and Apple iPhone 4s counts with iOS 8.x OS.
The Apple iPhone 4s features a much better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a lot lower 960 x 640 resolution, a bit worse amount of pixels per inch of display and a really smaller screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior memory to install games and applications than iPhone 4s, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much faster CPU than Apple iPhone 4s, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a superior battery performance than iPhone 4s. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a very superior camera than iPhone 4s, because it has a camera in the back with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution, a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photos and a way bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro costs a little more money than iPhone 4s, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.