Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 8.x, 7.x | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2013-09-10 | 2018-08-16 |
| 4.90 x 2.33 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.66 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue, Green, Pink, White and Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6 inches |
| 640 x 1136 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A6 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Swift (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 1016 MB (1066 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX 543MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 33.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1507mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 has an overall score of 77.6, which is better than iPhone 5c's 70 score. Although Moto Z3 is heavier than the iPhone 5c, it's extremely thinner and also incredibly newer. Moto Z3 works with Android 9.0 Pie OS, while iPhone 5c comes with iOS 8.x OS. IPhone 5c features a little sharper display than Moto Z3, although it has a bit inferior count of pixels per display inch, a much smaller screen and a much lower 1136 x 640px resolution.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a superior performance than Apple iPhone 5c, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The Moto Z3 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than iPhone 5c, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations, a much higher video quality, a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality photos and a lot better 12 MP resolution camera in the back.
Moto Z3 features a much bigger storage for games and applications than iPhone 5c, because it has 32 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z3 has a superior battery duration than iPhone 5c, because it has a 99 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Moto Z3 is also the cheapest, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.