Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| iOS 8.x, 7.x | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-10 | 2020-05-05 |
| 4.90 x 2.33 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.66 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue, Green, Pink, White and Yellow | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Polycarbonate | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 640 x 1136 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A6 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Swift (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1016 MB (1066 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX 543MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 33.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1507mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much better than iPhone 5c, with a score of 81.1 against 70. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 OS, and iPhone 5c works with iOS 8.x OS. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's construction has the same thickness than iPhone 5c, but it's incredibly heavier. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a better performing processing unit than iPhone 5c, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The iPhone 5c features a better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, a lot worse 1136 x 640 pixels resolution and a really smaller display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a lot better camera than iPhone 5c, because it has a much larger camera aperture for better low-light images, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone 5c, because it has 32 GB more internal memory and a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 5c, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 1507mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Apple iPhone 5c, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.