Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| iOS 8.x, 7.x | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-10 | 2020-05-05 |
| 4.90 x 2.33 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.66 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue, Green, Pink, White and Yellow | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Polycarbonate | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 640 x 1136 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A6 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Swift (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1016 MB (1066 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX 543MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 33.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1507mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is better than Apple iPhone 5c, with an 81.1 score against 70. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro comes with Android 10 operating system, while Apple iPhone 5c comes with iOS 8.x operating system. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a noticeably heavier device than Apple iPhone 5c, but they are 0.35inches thick.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a greater performance than Apple iPhone 5c, because it has a greater number of cores and 5,01 GB more RAM memory. IPhone 5c has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, a way worse 1136 x 640px resolution and a much smaller display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Apple iPhone 5c, because it has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality, a lot better (4K) video resolution, a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a lot bigger aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 5c, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB and more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than iPhone 5c, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.