Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 8.x, 7.x | -- |
| 2013-09-10 | 2017-06-29 |
| 4.90 x 2.33 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 4.66 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Blue, Green, Pink, White and Yellow | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Polycarbonate | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 209.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 640 x 1136 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A6 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Swift (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1016 MB (1066 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX 543MP3 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 33.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1507mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Play is better than Apple iPhone 5c, having a 77.4 score against 70. Motorola Moto Z2 Play's construction is newer and noticeably thinner than Apple iPhone 5c's, but it's a bit heavier. The Moto Z2 Play features a greater processing power than iPhone 5c, because it has 6 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
IPhone 5c features a sharper screen than Moto Z2 Play, although it has a lot worse resolution of 1136 x 640 pixels, a just a little worse pixel density and a way smaller screen. Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 5c, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a way better battery lifetime than iPhone 5c, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 1507mAh. Moto Z2 Play shoots better videos and photos than iPhone 5c, because it has a back camera with a lot better 12 mega pixels resolution, a much better (4K) video quality and a much larger aperture.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.