Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 8.x, 7.x | -- |
| 2013-09-10 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.90 x 2.33 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.66 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue, Green, Pink, White and Yellow | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 209.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 640 x 1136 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A6 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Swift (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1016 MB (1066 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX 543MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 33.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1507mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is much better than the Apple iPhone 5c's 70 general score. Galaxy A50 is a extremely newer and somewhat thinner phone than Apple iPhone 5c, but it's also way heavier. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a better processing power than iPhone 5c, because it has more RAM memory and more cpu cores.
The Apple iPhone 5c features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A50, although it has a way lower 1136 x 640 pixels resolution, a really smaller screen and a bit less pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy A50 has a way bigger storage for games and applications than iPhone 5c, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Apple iPhone 5c, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a back camera with much more mega pixels, a lot larger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A50 has a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone 5c, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50 not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.