Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 8.x, 7.x | -- |
| 2013-09-10 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.90 x 2.33 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.66 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Blue, Green, Pink, White and Yellow | Black, Pink and White |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 189.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 640 x 1136 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A6 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Swift (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1016 MB (1066 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX 543MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 33.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1507mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is better than the iPhone 5c, with a global score of 80.7 against 70. Even though the Google Pixel 3 XL is way heavier than iPhone 5c, it's thinner and also extremely newer. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a better performance than iPhone 5c, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 6 more cores.
IPhone 5c features a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a much smaller display, a way lower pixels density and a much lower resolution of 1136 x 640 pixels. The Google Pixel 3 XL shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 5c, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a lot larger aperture to capture better low-light photos, a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 5c, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much better battery duration than iPhone 5c, because it has a 3430mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3 XL costs a bit more money than the iPhone 5c, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.