Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 9.x | -- |
| 2015-09-09 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 625.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL1022 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.72 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4, having a global score of 84.2 against 81.9. Although the Apple iPhone 6s Plus is notably older and heavier than the Google Pixel 4, it's body is still a little thinner. The iPhone 6s Plus has a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, although it has a quite worse count of pixels per display inch, a little smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080.
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage. IPhone 6s Plus features a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 4, because although it has less RAM and 6 less and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an extra graphics processing unit.
The Google Pixel 4 takes clearer pictures and videos than iPhone 6s Plus, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel 4 also has a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations, a higher 12.2 MP resolution camera in the back and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality photos.
The Google Pixel 4 has a little longer battery duration than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity against 2750mAh.
Although iPhone 6s Plus is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4. So if you need that extra features, you can buy iPhone 6s Plus, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 4, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.