Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 9.x | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-09-09 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 625.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL1022 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus has an overall score of 84.2, which is better than Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. Apple iPhone 6s Plus works with iOS 9.x OS, and Moto Z Force counts with Android 7.0 Nougat OS. Although the Apple iPhone 6s Plus is better than the Moto Z Force, it must be told that it is also older, just a bit thicker and heavier.
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus counts with a bit better processor than Moto Z Force, because although it has less and slower processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processing unit. The Apple iPhone 6s Plus counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a quite worse display density, they both have a same size screen.
The Moto Z Force takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto Z Force also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and video.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with better battery performance than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 2750mAh.
Although iPhone 6s Plus is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Moto Z Force, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.