Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 9.x | -- |
| 2015-09-09 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 625.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL1022 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 6s Plus is a bit better than the Moto Z2 Play, having a general score of 84.2 against 77.4. Even though iPhone 6s Plus is a better cellphone than Moto Z2 Play, it must be told that it's also older, notably heavier and somewhat thicker. IPhone 6s Plus has a more vivid screen than Moto Z2 Play. Both have exactly the same resolution of 1920 x 1080px, the same display density and a screen of the same size.
IPhone 6s Plus counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processing unit. The Moto Z2 Play features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 6s Plus, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
IPhone 6s Plus counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Play, although it has a lot tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light photography, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same (4K) video resolution and a 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera. Moto Z2 Play features just a bit longer battery lifetime than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2750mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 6s Plus is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.