Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 9.x | Android 12 |
| 2015-09-09 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | -- |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 625.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL1022 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.72 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having a general score of 84.2 against 77.6. The Apple iPhone 6s Plus construction is thinner and lighter than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, even though it was released many years before. Apple iPhone 6s Plus works with iOS 9.x operating system, while Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus has a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 4 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64-bit CPU. IPhone 6s Plus has an incredibly better display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel number in each inch in the screen.
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus captures a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and/or video in poorly lited environments and a camera with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a way better battery duration than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.