Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 9.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-09-09 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 625.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 401 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL1022 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 6s Plus has a global score of 84.2, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. The iPhone 6s Plus has iOS 9.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro works with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. The iPhone 6s Plus body is noticeably lighter and a lot thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although it was released many years before.
IPhone 6s Plus counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has lesser RAM memory and 6 less and slower processing cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processor and an extra graphics co-processor. Apple iPhone 6s Plus counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way lower number of pixels in each display inch and a much lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a little bigger display.
The iPhone 6s Plus has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs and a much smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and videos in low-light environments, and they both have a 12 megapixels resolution back camera, the iPhone 6s Plus also counts with a much better video resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a superior battery duration than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has a 64 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.