Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 9.x | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-09 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 625.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL1022 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.9 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is slightly better than iPhone 6s Plus's 84.2 overall score. Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is newer and thinner, but also heavier than the iPhone 6s Plus. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has Android 11 OS, and iPhone 6s Plus works with iOS 9.x OS. IPhone 6s Plus counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has an inferior number of cores and slower and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64 bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus has a sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way smaller display and a much lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The iPhone 6s Plus shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3. Both of them have a 12 MP resolution camera and a F2.2 diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.