Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 9.x | Android 15 |
| 2015-09-09 | -- |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 5.04 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Obsidian and Porcelain |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 575.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 750 x 1334 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | -- |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 2700 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 4.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 6s has a general score of 83, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s global score of 76.7. IPhone 6s has iOS 9.x operating system, while Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 15 operating system. Apple iPhone 6s counts with a way better looking screen than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a really smaller display and way less brightness.
The iPhone 6s counts with a much powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has 6 less cores (although they are faster) and 14 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a graphics processor. The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a really longer battery life than iPhone 6s, because it has a 171% larger battery capacity. Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has better 60 fps video frame rate and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.