Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 9.x | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-09-09 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 575.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 750 x 1334 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 6s has an overall score of 83, which is slightly better than the Moto Z Force's score of 75.8. IPhone 6s is a lighter device than Moto Z Force, but they are equally thin. The iPhone 6s has iOS 9.x OS, while Moto Z Force counts with Android 7.0 Nougat OS. Apple iPhone 6s counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores and also slower, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and an additional graphics co-processor.
Apple iPhone 6s counts with a slightly better looking screen than Moto Z Force, although it has a much worse pixel count per screen inch, a lot worse 1334 x 750px resolution and a bit smaller display. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and video and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z Force features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 6s, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force features a way better battery life than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 6s is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone 6s, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto Z Force, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.