Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 9.x | -- |
| 2015-09-09 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 575.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 750 x 1334 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 6s is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, having an 83 score against 77.4. Even though Apple iPhone 6s is older and thicker than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it's body is still just a bit lighter. The iPhone 6s counts with a brighter display than Moto Z2 Play, although it has a way lower resolution of 1334 x 750, a little bit smaller screen and a little worse amount of pixels per display inch.
The Moto Z2 Play counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 6s, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The iPhone 6s features a bit faster processor than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processor and an additional graphics co-processor.
Moto Z2 Play has a much longer battery life than iPhone 6s, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. IPhone 6s has just a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Play, although it has a way smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same resolution camera.
Although iPhone 6s is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 6s, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z2 Play, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.