Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 9.x | Android 13 |
| 2015-09-09 | -- |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 5.04 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | -- |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 575.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 750 x 1334 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 6s has an overall score of 83, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A34's score of 82.9. IPhone 6s has iOS 9.x OS, and Galaxy A34 has Android 13 OS. Apple iPhone 6s has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A34, because although it has lesser RAM memory and 6 less and slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and an extra graphics processor.
Apple iPhone 6s counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy A34, although it has a little bit lower display density, a way smaller display and a lot worse 1334 x 750 resolution. Apple iPhone 6s features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A34, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A34 has a way better battery life than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A34 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than iPhone 6s, because it has a camera in the back with way more MP, a lot larger back camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and a larger aperture to take better low-light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.