Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 9.x | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-09-09 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | -- |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 575.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 750 x 1334 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a little bit better than the Apple iPhone 6s, having a score of 91.3 against 83. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with Android 12 OS, and Apple iPhone 6s comes with iOS 9.x OS. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G body is extremely newer than the Apple iPhone 6s's, but it is thicker and notably heavier.
The Apple iPhone 6s counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processor. The Apple iPhone 6s features just a bit better display than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a way worse 1334 x 750 resolution, a way smaller screen and a little worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 6s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than iPhone 6s, because it has a 162 percent greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a much bigger back camera sensor, a bigger camera aperture and a back camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.