Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 9.x | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-09 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 575.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 750 x 1334 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 6s has a score of 83, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's overall score of 76.9. IPhone 6s counts with iOS 9.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with Android 10 OS. The iPhone 6s design is way lighter and a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy A70, even though it was released many years before.
Apple iPhone 6s has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A70, because although it has lesser and slower CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processor. The iPhone 6s has a brighter display than Galaxy A70, although it has a little bit lower screen density, a lot worse resolution of 1334 x 750 pixels and a way smaller screen.
Apple iPhone 6s features a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller sensor and a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited situations, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy A70 has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A70 has a much longer battery life than iPhone 6s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 6s is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone 6s, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A70, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.