Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 9.x | -- |
| 2015-09-09 | 2017-07-07 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 575.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 750 x 1334 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 6s is a bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting a score of 83 against 80.4. Despite of the fact that the iPhone 6s is older than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it's body is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner. The iPhone 6s has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone 6s features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, although it has a bit smaller screen, a way worse display pixel density and a lot lower resolution of 1334 x 750 pixels. Apple iPhone 6s has just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality images and a way tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, they both have the same resolution camera, the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 6s, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone 6s, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity.
Apple iPhone 6s is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.