Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 9.x | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-09 | -- |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 575.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 750 x 1334 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 6s has a score of 83, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S24 FE's general score of 76. The Apple iPhone 6s body is incredibly lighter and a bit thinner than the Galaxy S24 FE. Apple iPhone 6s has iOS 9.x OS, and Galaxy S24 FE counts with Android 14 OS. Galaxy S24 FE features just a bit better looking display than iPhone 6s, because it has a really brighter screen, a really larger display, a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit better quantity of pixels in each screen inch.
Galaxy S24 FE has as much storage to store more apps and games as the Apple iPhone 6s one, they have the same 128 GB internal memory. Apple iPhone 6s has a much greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores , a 64 bits processing unit and an additional graphics processor.
The Galaxy S24 FE counts with a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity. Apple iPhone 6s counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a smaller aperture and a camera in the back with a much lower 12 mega-pixels resolution.
IPhone 6s not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy S24 FE, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.