Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 9.x | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-09 | 2021-03-12 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 575.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 750 x 1334 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 6s is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, getting a overall score of 83 against 78.1. Even though the Apple iPhone 6s is notably older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, it's body is much thinner and somewhat lighter. Apple iPhone 6s counts with iOS 9.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 works with Android 11 operating system.
IPhone 6s counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 6 less and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a GPU and a 64-bits processing unit. Apple iPhone 6s counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1334 x 750 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better display density.
The Apple iPhone 6s captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a smaller aperture and a lot less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition. The Galaxy XCover 5 counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than iPhone 6s, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 features a superior battery performance than iPhone 6s, because it has a 3000mAh battery size instead of 1715mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.