Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 9.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-09-09 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 575.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 750 x 1334 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 326 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 6s has a global score of 83, which is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. Even though the Apple iPhone 6s is notably older than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's body is incredibly lighter and noticeably thinner. Apple iPhone 6s comes with iOS 9.x operating system, while Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The Apple iPhone 6s features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser and slower processing cores, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processing unit. Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Apple iPhone 6s have incredibly similar displays, although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a lot better screen density, a quite larger display and a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone 6s, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. IPhone 6s features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos and a tinier sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the iPhone 6s also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a superior battery life than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 1715mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Apple iPhone 6s is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.