Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 9.x | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-09 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 575.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 750 x 1334 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is slightly better than iPhone 6s's 83 score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's body has the same thickness than the iPhone 6s, but it's way heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip comes with Android 12 OS, and iPhone 6s counts with iOS 9.x OS. IPhone 6s counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a way worse resolution of 1334 x 750px, a really smaller screen and a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with much more memory to install games and applications than iPhone 6s, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The iPhone 6s has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a lower number of slower cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processor.
Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better camera than Apple iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a larger camera aperture for better low-light captures and video.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a superior battery life than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has a 92% larger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than iPhone 6s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the iPhone 6s. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save some dollars and get the iPhone 6s, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.