Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 9.x | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-09 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminium, Glass and Steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 575.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 750 x 1334 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A9 APL0898 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.9 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is just a bit better than the iPhone 6s's general score of 83. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11 operating system, while iPhone 6s has iOS 9.x operating system. Galaxy Z Flip 3's design is noticeably newer and just a bit thinner than the iPhone 6s's, but it's way heavier.
The iPhone 6s counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores, it also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64 bits processing unit. The Apple iPhone 6s counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a much smaller screen, a little less pixels per display inch and a way lower resolution of 1334 x 750px.
IPhone 6s and Galaxy Z Flip 3 feature quite similar memory for apps and games, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage. Apple iPhone 6s takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a smaller aperture, they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has a 92 percent bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the iPhone 6s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the iPhone 6s. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the iPhone 6s, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.